The Presidency has said that President
Muhammadu Buhari will not interfere in the ongoing probes being carried
out by the National Assembly.
It said the Senate’s probes of the
Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim
Lamorde, and the power sector from 1999 to 2015, were purely legislative
matters and that the President could not stop them.
The Senate Committee on Business and
Ethics is currently probing an allegation of diversion of N1tn proceeds
of corruption recovered by the EFCC.
The
Chief Executive Officer of Panic Alert Security Systems, Mr. George
Uboh, had, in a petition submitted to the committee, accused Lamorde of
diverting the money.
Also, the Senate Ad-hoc committee on
power is investigating expenditures in the power sector under former
Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan.
When asked if Buhari had confidence in
the probes of Lamorde and the former presidents, the Senior Special
Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Femi Adesina, said
the President could not interfere with the probes because of his respect
for the principle separation of powers.
Adesina, who spoke with SUNDAY PUNCH,
said, “There is separation of powers and the Senate has the power to
conduct probes. Thus, the Presidency does not need to endorse or oppose
any probe being carried out by the legislature. It is within their power
to do so.”
The Permanent Secretary of the Ministry
of Power, Mr. Goodknows Igali, had on Monday told the Senate Ad-hoc
Committee on Power that the government had spent a total of N2.7tn on
the power sector from 1999 to date.
He said that power generation had risen from 3,500 megawatts in 1999 to 4,600 megawatts presently.
Why we can’t investigate EFCC boss – PSC
There is also a strong indication that
the Police Service Commission may not act on the report of the probe of
Lamorde, which began in the Senate on August 26.
The PSC said it could not probe or sanction Lamorde over allegations of graft because he was not under the commission.
The PSC Commissioner in charge of media,
Comfort Obi, said although Lamorde is a policeman, he is not subject to
the supervision of the commission as he is an employee of the
Presidency.
Obi said she could not comment on the
allegations of graft against the EFCC chairman because the petition
against him was not addressed to the PSC.
According to her, the petition was
addressed to the Senate, which is investigating the allegations of graft
levelled against Lamorde.
She said, “Though the EFCC chairman is a
police officer, he is not under the Police Service Commission. We cannot
comment on his case; he is now an employee of the President. Besides,
the petition against him was not addressed to the Police Service
Commission; it was addressed to the Senate, which is probing it.”
When asked if the commission discussed the petition with the Force headquarters, Obi said it was not discussed.
Afenifere, others dismiss probes
Some socio-political groups have
dismissed the ongoing probes in the Senate. The pan Yoruba
socio-political group, Afenifere, described the probes as a waste of
time.
Its Publicity Secretary, Mr. Yinka Odumakin, in an interview with SUNDAY PUNCH, said
“If you are probing all your immediate past presidents at the same time
and the chairman of your anti-graft body is also under the radar for
corruption, should it not occur to you that you have a systemic crisis?
“Probes are a mere waste of time under a
structurally defective arrangement like this. Beyond exciting the
public, nothing is going to be achieved. What we need to do is to smash
the architecture of corruption. If we don’t, the vicious cycle
continues.”
Uboh, had in his petition, alleged that
Lamorde fraudulently diverted over N1tn proceeds of corruption recovered
by the anti-graft agency.
According the petitioner, part of the
money allegedly diverted by the EFCC boss included the loot recovered
from a former Governor of Bayelsa State, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha; and
ex-Inspector-General of Police, Tafa Balogun.
But the commission had in an August 24
statement by its spokesperson, Wilson Uwujaren, described Uboh’s
petition as mischievous and intended to smear Lamorde.
The statement read in part, “The EFCC as
an agency that is founded on transparency is not afraid of any ‘probe’
or request for information regarding its activities by individuals,
groups or organs of government; so far as such requests followed due
process of law.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment